In today’s world, the protection of endangered species is an increasingly urgent issue. Some argue that society should prioritize the preservation of all plant and animal species, no matter the cost to humans. Others believe that the resources required to save these species may not justify the potential impact on human well-being. In this post, we’ll break down a common GRE Issue Essay prompt on this topic, evaluate both perspectives, and explore a sample response that earned a perfect score.
Understanding the Prompt
This GRE “Analyze an Issue” prompt presents a dilemma: Should society make extraordinary efforts to preserve all plant and animal species, even at significant cost to humans, or should human priorities take precedence when resources are limited?
The prompt asks you to analyze both sides and explain which view you agree with—and why.
Arguments For Prioritizing Endangered Species
- Biodiversity is essential to the health and stability of ecosystems.
- Each species plays a unique ecological role, and the loss of one can trigger cascading effects.
- Species have intrinsic value and a right to exist.
- Extinction can mean lost opportunities for medical advances and food security.
- Conservation can be economically beneficial through ecotourism and sustainable development.
Arguments Against Extraordinary Conservation Efforts
- Extinction is a natural process; not every species can or should be saved.
- Resources used for conservation might be better spent on pressing human needs like healthcare or poverty reduction.
- Some conservation efforts can displace communities or limit economic opportunities.
- The return on investment for saving certain species may be low, with no guarantee of success.
- Addressing the root causes (pollution, habitat loss) may be more effective than direct species protection.
My Take: Conservation and Humanity Can Coexist
After weighing both perspectives, I believe that society should make extraordinary efforts to preserve endangered species. The long-term environmental, ethical, and economic benefits of biodiversity far outweigh the costs.
That said, I also acknowledge the importance of human well-being. But framing this as an either/or choice is misleading. It’s entirely possible—and necessary—to protect ecosystems while supporting human development. Through sustainable practices and eco-conscious innovation, we can align economic growth with environmental preservation.
“We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children.” – Chief Seattle
Preserving biodiversity isn’t just about protecting animals and plants—it’s about securing a livable future for humanity itself.
Example of a Perfect-Scoring GRE Essay (Score: 6)
Balance Between Conservation and Human Well-Being
The question of whether society should go to extraordinary lengths to protect every plant and animal species, regardless of the cost to humans, is a complex and timely one. While some argue that we have a moral obligation to preserve all forms of life, others believe that the resources and sacrifices required may be too great—particularly when human well-being is at stake. In my view, neither of these extremes presents a wholly effective solution. A balanced, strategic approach is necessary—one that protects critical species while also taking into account the practical needs of humanity.
On one side of the debate, advocates for widespread conservation emphasize the ecological importance of biodiversity. Each species plays a unique and often irreplaceable role within its ecosystem, and the loss of even one can lead to unintended consequences across the food chain and environment. The concept of biophilia—the innate human affinity for nature—suggests that we are emotionally and psychologically connected to the natural world. From this perspective, the extinction of any species is not only a biological loss but a moral and cultural one as well.
On the other hand, critics argue that the financial, labor, and social costs of conserving every endangered species can be overwhelming. Governments and communities may be forced to divert funding from pressing issues such as education, public health, or poverty alleviation. In some cases, conservation measures can disrupt local economies or displace people whose livelihoods depend on access to natural resources. These are legitimate concerns that cannot be ignored.
Rather than adopting an all-or-nothing stance, I believe we should prioritize conservation efforts that focus on species whose survival is essential to ecosystem stability—or whose extinction would result in widespread environmental consequences. This pragmatic approach allows us to allocate limited resources more effectively and ensure the greatest possible impact.
Importantly, protecting the environment and supporting human well-being are not mutually exclusive goals. In fact, conservation efforts can stimulate economic growth through ecotourism, green innovation, and the creation of sustainable jobs. When implemented thoughtfully, environmental protection can coexist with human progress and improve quality of life for both current and future generations.
In conclusion, while it is neither feasible nor necessary to save every species at any cost, we must reject the idea that human and environmental interests are in conflict. By targeting our conservation efforts and integrating them with sustainable economic development, we can strike a meaningful balance—one that respects the natural world without neglecting the needs of humanity.
Why This Essay Earned a Perfect Score
- Balanced analysis: The writer addresses both sides fairly and thoughtfully.
- Complex reasoning: Concepts like biophilia and ripple effects add depth.
- Practical recommendations: The middle-ground approach is realistic and actionable.
- Counterarguments are addressed: The essay acknowledges human concerns and provides solutions.
- Flawless structure and grammar: The writing is cohesive, clear, and persuasive.
Key Takeaways for GRE Test-Takers
- Don’t take extreme stances—nuance and balance often lead to higher scores.
- Support your argument with logical reasoning and real-world implications.
- Use specific examples and vocabulary that elevate your analysis (like “biophilia”).
- Anticipate and address counterarguments to strengthen your position.
- Keep your writing structured, coherent, and free of grammar mistakes.
Prefer to Learn by Listening?
Tune into the related podcast episode where we break down this essay, analyze the prompt, and provide extra tips for success on the GRE Analytical Writing section.